The Ultimate Guide to Fluorescent Penetrant Testing [Infographic]

  •  

Some handy tips for beginners who are new to fluorescent penetrant testing or NDT pros who want an easy reference guide


 

The Importance of Liquid Penetrant Inspection

Liquid penetrant inspection is a nondestructive test method which does not harm the parts being inspected. The testing methods detect cracks, fractures, laps, seams and other flaws that are open to the surface that may have been caused by fatigue, impact, quenching, machining, grinding, forging or overload. The process is used on machined parts, castings, forgings and other items that will be placed into service or already in service requiring maintenance.

The process involves applying a penetrant chemical, visible or fluorescent, directly to the part that’s to be inspected. The excess penetrant is removed and a developer is applied to draw the penetrant deep from the cracks to the surface of the part. The penetrant contrasts with the surface of the part so the crack is identified more easily. Fluorescent penetrants are used under an ultraviolet light that makes penetrant fluoresce. The chemical, equipment and NDT accessory choices have grown but the fundamentals and benefits of liquid penetrant inspection have endured the test of time.

Versatile material uses and applications

Liquid penetrant inspection can be performed on most materials that are not extremely rough or porous, including material composition that is metallic or nonmetallic, magnetic or nonmagnetic and conductive or nonconductive.

Rapidly inspect large areas and high volumes of parts

Liquid penetrant inspection is a fast, easy and efficient means of surface inspection. Large quantities of parts or materials can be inspected quickly. Parts of almost any shape, size and geometry can be inspected.

Identify small surface discontinuities with high sensitivity

Sensitivity levels are a classification system specifically for fluorescent liquid penetrants that are not applied to visible penetrants. Higher sensitivity penetrants have the capability to detect smaller cracks and defects.

 


 

Selecting the Correct Penetrant Method Per AMS 2644

Penetrant Types

  • Type 1: Fluorescent dye
  • Type 2: Visible dye

Penetrant Methods

  • Method A: Water washable
  • Method B: Post emulsifiable, lipophilic
  • Method C: Solvent removable
  • Method D: Post emulsifiable, hydrophilic

Developer Forms

  • Form a: Dry powder
  • Form b: Water soluble
  • Form c: Water suspendible
  • Form d: Nonaqueous Type 1 fluorescent
  • Form e: Nonaqueous Type 2 visible dye


 

Differences Between Sensitivity  

AMS 2644 Penetrant Sensitivity Levels

Sensitivity levels are a classification system for fluorescent liquid penetrants which is outlined in AMS 2644 Inspection Material, Penetrant specification. Sensitivity levels are not applied to visible penetrants.

  • Level ½: Ultra low sensitivity
  • Level 1: Low sensitivity
  • Level 2: Medium sensitivity
  • Level 3: High sensitivity
  • Level 4: Ultra high sensitivity

 

How to Determine Which Sensitivity Level to Use

The primary consideration when deciding on which sensitivity level penetrant to use is the guidance provided by governing specifications. The penetrant sensitivity level is stated in the working specifications for the process. This is particularly true when penetrant inspection involves safety critical parts. The specifications and standard operating procedures will dictate the penetrant sensitivity to be used.

If the penetrant sensitivity level is not already established by a specification or procedure, evaluation on actual parts with a few penetrants is strongly recommended. A lower sensitivity penetrant works well on rough surfaces, while a higher sensitivity penetrant is suitable for highly machined surfaces. Penetrant evaluation on actual parts is important to confirm proper sensitivity with acceptable background fluorescence to detect the type of defects typically found on the parts.

Penetrant evaluation on actual test parts can also confirm proper processing parameters such as dwell time and rinse time. It is possible that more than one penetrant sensitivity level will be used in a facility because of different parts, processes, and customer specifications in use at a given location.

 

Understand fluorescent liquid penetrant sensitivity levels and how to find the right one for your application here.


 

Common Applications

Aerospace processes commonly use Method D Level 4 penetrants for safety critical rotating parts including turbine blades.

 

Automotive processes commonly use Method A Level 1 penetrants to inspect non ferrous components such as steering knuckles and subframes.

Power Generation commonly uses Method A Level 2 penetrants to inspect non ferrous parts such as large castings, forgings, impeller blades, and more.


 

Common Terms

  • Background – the surface of the test part against which the indication is viewed. It may be the natural surface of the test part or the developer coating on the surface.
  • Bleedout – the action of an entrapped liquid penetrant in surfacing from discontinuities to form indications.
  • Developer – a material that is applied to the test surface to accelerate bleedout and to enhance the contrast of indications.
  • Developing Time – the elapsed time between the application of the developer and the examination of the part.
  • Dwell Time – the total time that the penetrant or emulsifier is in contact with the test surface, including the time required for application and the drain time.
  • Inspection – visual examination of the test part after completion of the liquid penetrant processing steps.
  • Liquid Penetrant Testing – a nondestructive test that uses liquid penetrant materials to penetrate and detect various types of discontinuities open to the surface.
  • Liquid Penetrant – a solution of dye with the ability to penetrate into fine openings.
  • Precleaning – the removal of surface contaminants from the test part so that they will not interfere with the examination process.
  • Sensitivity Level – the descriptive term for identifying the capability of a penetrant system to indicate the presence of a surfaceconnected discontinuity. 

 


 

Please wait while we gather your results.

Related Blog Posts

Liquid Penetrant in Dip Tank

How to Maintain Penetrant Testing System Performance

Learn how liquid penetrant testing products lose performance over time and what to do to ensure penetrant test reliability.

Read More...

Case Study – Comparison of penetrant inspection and eddy current testing on a corroded test sample

Our customer is an aerospace MRO (maintenance, repair and operations) company based in the UK, with an aerospace training college. Part of their training includes teaching students about NDT capabilities within the aerospace sector, identifying the strengths/weaknesses and applicability of different NDT inspection techniques.

Read More...

Benefits of Developer

Benefits of Using Developer During Liquid Penetrant Inspection [Case Study]

Learn how a automotive manufacturer increased indication detection in visible and UV light with developer.

Read More...

Magnetic Particle Crack Comparison

How Brightness and Contrast Impact NDT Inspections

How perception and vision can have a significant impact on probability of detection in non-destructive testing inspections.

Read More...

Dye Penetrant Testing on Pipe

How Low Temperatures Impact Dye Penetrant Testing

Learn how lower inspection temperatures affect the performance of dye penetrant testing cleaners, penetrant and developers

Read More...

Magnaflux Dye Penetrant Testing

How to Do Visible Dye Penetrant Testing [Video]

Watch an overview of the dye penetrant testing method according to ASTM E1417, including basic steps for NDT with an AMS 2644 Type 2 penetrant.

Read More...

ASTM E1417: Key Changes and Updates

ASTM E1417: Key Changes and Updates

The next revision of ASTM E1417 has been published, and a lot is changing. Here are several changes that you should be aware of.

Read More...

Why Penetrant Removability is Important, Not Just Sensitivity

Why Penetrant Removability is Important, Not Just Sensitivity

High quality fluorescent liquid penetrant inspections require strong removability combined with strong sensitivity to deliver clear, crisp indications

Read More...

4 Level III Daily Responsibilities

4 Level III Daily Responsibilities

Defining the different types of Level IIIs and some aspects of what their job entails

Read More...

What Do I Do If My Penetrant Freezes!?

What Do I Do If My Penetrant Freezes!?

Discover what mixing or testing could be required to return a penetrant to its original state once it has frozen

Read More...

What Value Does ISO 9001 Add?

What Value Does ISO 9001 Add?

Learn how ISO 9001 affects the NDT materials you use, therefore affecting your quality management system

Read More...

5 Things to Consider When Choosing a Mag Particle Yoke [Checklist]

4 Habits of NDT Aerosol Safe Handling

Safety is a make-or-break factor in a technician's world – we list details around hazards, storage, recycling, and shipping of NDT aerosols

Read More...

NADCAP and Known Defect Standards

Understanding Nadcap System Performance Check and Known Defect Standards

Properly demonstrating the system performance check was the #2 Nadcap audit finding for penetrant systems. What do you need to do to comply?

Read More...

Learn about the available properties of developers

Does Developer Dry Time Impact Indication Strength?

Learn about the available properties of developers and the relationship between dwell time and inspection quality

Read More...

Success with the Right Precleaning

Prepare for Penetrant Testing Success with the Right Precleaning

Learn why proper precleaning before liquid penetrant inspections can make or break your nondestructive testing results

Read More...

AMS 2644 Penetrant Sensitivity Levels

A Guide to AMS 2644 Penetrant Sensitivity Levels

Understand fluorescent liquid penetrant sensitivity levels and how to find the right one for your application

Read More...

Protective Armor Inspection with Zyglo Penetrant [Case Study]

Case Study - Protective Armor Inspection with ZYGLO Penetrant

In this case study, we show how an armor solutions provider increased quality control on a semi-porous surface with ZL-19

Read More...

automotive suspension system

Case Study – Use of ZYGLO® ZL-60C for the inspection of automotive suspension systems

Case Study – Use of ZYGLO® ZL-60C for the inspection of automotive suspension systems

Read More...

Liquid penetrants for leak detection of ventilation systems

Case Study - Using Fluorescent Penetrant for Ventilation System Leak Detention

Learn how to look at the recommended actions associated with the chemical risk assessment.

Read More...

Magnaflux Penetrant Inspection

Case Study - Higher Sensitivity Penetrant Improves Inspection Quality

In this case study, we help an aerospace customer improve inspection quality and consistency with two Magnaflux penetrants

Read More...

Magnaflux Penetrant Inspection

Case Study - Understanding Type-, Batch- and In-Use-Testing for Liquid Penetrants

Learn the differences between type testing, batch testing and in-use testing for NDT liquid penetrants.

Read More...

Case Study – Use of SPOTCHECK® SKL-WP2 for inspecting welded fabrications

Case Study – Use of SPOTCHECK® SKL-WP2 for inspecting welded fabrications

Read More...

Case Study – Use of non-aqueous developers containing propan-2-ol

Case Study – Use of non-aqueous developers containing propan-2-ol

Read More...

Case Study – Use of SPOTCHECK SKL-SP2 for medical packaging inspection

Case Study – Use of SPOTCHECK SKL-SP2 for medical packaging inspection

Read More...

Magnaflux Penetrant Testing

Exposing 10 Common Misunderstandings about Penetrant Testing

We reveal common misperceptions about liquid penetrant inspection we’ve seen in the field in recent years

Read More...

10 erreurs récurrentes rencontrées dans le contrôle par ressuage

10 erreurs récurrentes rencontrées dans le contrôle par ressuage

10 erreurs récurrentes rencontrées dans le contrôle par ressuage

Read More...

ASTM E1417 : Principaux changements et mises à jour

ASTM E1417 : Principaux changements et mises à jour

La nouvelle révision de l’ASTM E1417 a été publiée et beaucoup de choses changent. Voici plusieurs changements dont vous devriez avoir connaissances.

Read More...

Inspección por Líquidos Penetrantes

Exponiendo 10 malentendidos comunes sobre las pruebas penetrantes

En el siguiente artículo revelamos las percepciones erróneas más comunes sobre la inspección por líquidos penetrantes

Read More...

Subscribe to Magnaflux NDT Blogs:

Magnaflux

Faraday Road, South Dorcan Industrial Estate
Swindon, Wiltshire, SN3 5HE, UK
Telephone: +44 (0)1793 524566
Contact Magnaflux Customer Service

Magnaflux, A Division of ITW Limited   VAT number: GB 531 8325 59

Select Your Country North America Mexico Brazil China Europe India New Zealand, Australia, Japan, Southeast Asia
© 2024 Magnaflux - All Rights Reserved.
top