ASTM E1444: Key Changes and Updates

  •  

In October 2021, ASTM E1444 was published, replacing the 2016 revision. This revision is a part of a standard review cycle to address changes in the aerospace industry.

 

By Shawn Kilty, Division R&D Manager, and David Geis, Product Manager 

The next revision of ASTM E1444 is out, and a lot is changing.  In total, more than seventy changes and updates are going into effect in this specification. Here are several significant changes you should be aware of. 

 

1. E1444 will become an Aerospace-only standard

There are significant differences in how magnetic particle inspection in Aerospace compared to other industries. Beyond just the process checks, there are restrictions on the allowable types of materials and equipment. Rather than trying to accommodate all possible applications with a single standard, the scope of E1444 is changing to focus only on the Aerospace industry.  Non-Aerospace users will have to switch over to E3024 Standard Practice for Magnetic Particle Testing for General Industry. 

 

2. No visible or dry particles

One effect of the Aerospace-only scope change is the removal of all references to visible magnetic particle materials — only wet fluorescent magnetic particles in the latest revision. If your application uses visible color-contrast materials or dry magnetic powders, you will need to change to E3024 as your standard. 

 

3. Removal of industrial magnetizing techniques and accessories

With the transition to the Aerospace-only scope, the following accessories and techniques not in E1444: 

  • Laminated Flux Strips
  • Pie Gauges
  • Battery-Powered Yokes
  • Permanent Magnet Yokes
  • Magnetic Leeches
  • Prods
  • Particle Sensitivity Devices (magnetic cards, MTU blocks, etc.)

Handheld yokes, in general, will only be permitted with prior authorization by the Cognizant Engineering Organization (CEO) or Level III. Specialized techniques like magnetic slurries for underwater use, magnetic polymers, tapes, and films are also not included in E1444.   
If your application uses any of these materials or techniques, you will need to change to E3024 as your standard. 

 

4. Changes to process controls and calibrations

Table 1 in E1444 spells out all of the required process controls and calibrations and the frequency at which each must occur. All of the changes in this revision involve UV-A lamps. New requirements require checking the intensity of battery-powered lights before and after each use. This ensures that a drop in battery output has not caused the UV intensity to fall below the minimum required levels. The integrity of all UV-A lamps must now be completed daily instead of weekly. It is not specified in Table 1 (instead refer to section 7.4.5), but this revision also requires checking that LED UV-A lamps daily to ensure all diodes are functioning. 

 

5. No more Ketos rings

It has been over 20 years since the publication of AS-5282 standardizing the Tool Steel Ring for system performance. Since then, AS-5282 rings have had better magnetic performance than the original Ketos rings due to stricter alloy and heat treatment control. To accommodate existing systems and older equipment, the specs for old Ketos rings were maintained in E1444. Starting with the new revision, the Ketos ring will not be carried forward, and only AS-5282 rings will be acceptable.

 

5. Removal of formulas for determining proper current

Formulas used to calculate magnetizing current have been around for ages. They are used in MT training programs and for developing a technique on a new part. But real-world part geometry is not always straightforward, and formulas are just a starting point at best. For Aerospace applications, the Level III is responsible for determining the current necessary for adequate magnetization. That is normally done with sample parts and QQIs, not with calculations. While the formulas are no longer in E1444, they will remain in E3024 and E709 Standard Guide for Magnetic Particle Testing for reference and training purposes.

 

6. Requiring inspection before demagnetization

Inspection of parts before demagnetization is now explicitly required by ASTM E1444.  Inspecting parts after demag increases the likelihood of particles migrating away from an indication, potentially leading to missed flaws. Although this is likely self-evident to most MPI practitioners, it was never explicitly called out in prior revisions of E1444.   

 

7. Discard murky magnetic particle baths

Magnetic particle baths can become cloudy over time for several reasons. Contamination from lubricants or other machining fluids can turn the bath hazy and will sometimes add a bluish fluorescence to the bath.

A cloudy bath could also be a sign of the particles starting to break down. Bright yellow-green fluorescence observed in the liquid bath after the particles have been allowed to settle is the most common sign of particle breakdown.

E1444 now requires that the liquid portion is evaluated for clarity under visible and UV light after the particle concentration test. If the graduation marks on the pear-shaped centrifuge tube (between the 5 and 25 ml marks) are not visible, then the bath must be discarded.   

 

Published 26 October 2021

Please wait while we gather your results.

Related Blog Articles

ASTM E1444: Key Changes and Updates

ASTM E1444: Key Changes and Updates

The next revision of ASTM E1444 is out for the final ballot, and a lot is changing. Here are five significant changes that you should know about for 2021.

The Clear Choice for Magnetic Particles

Learn what factors influence magnetic particle performance

The most common incorrect assumptions about magnetic particle inspection

10 Misunderstandings about Magnetic Particle Testing [Video]

This article discusses the most common incorrect assumptions about magnetic particle inspection and gives you some solutions to combat these misunderstandings

Breaking Down How to Use Magnetic Flux Indicators and QQIs

Breaking Down How to Use Magnetic Flux Indicators and QQIs

In this article, we define Magnetic Particle Inspection Flux Indicator Strips and Quantitative Quality Indicators (QQI) and give a user manual approach to find artificial flaw standards.

5 Things to Consider When Choosing a Mag Particle Yoke [Checklist]

5 Things to Consider When Choosing a Mag Particle Yoke [Checklist]

In this article we outline some key factors to consider when selecting the right electromagnetic yoke or contour probe for magnetic particle testing

Importance d'utiliser la bonne huile en magnétoscopie

Importance d'utiliser la bonne huile en magnétoscopie

Importance d'utiliser la bonne huile en magnétoscopie

NDT Carrier Oil Fluid for Mag Particle Testing

Frequently Asked Questions About NDT Carrier Fluid

In this article, we explain what an NDT-approved carrier is and what sets it apart from commonly used, non-approved base oils

Magnetic Field Safety Guidelines for Pacemakers

Magnetic Field Safety Guidelines for Pacemakers

This article reviews the limitations of operators with cardiac pacemaker’s exposure to magnetic particle inspection equipment.

Magnetic Particle Crack Comparison

How Brightness and Contrast Impact NDT Inspections

How perception and vision can have a significant impact on probability of detection in non-destructive testing inspections.

5-Point Guide to Yoke Best Practices

5-Point Guide to Yoke Best Practices

Learn how daily checks and maintenance can improve the lifespan of a yoke for a safer work environment

4 Level III Daily Responsibilities

4 Level III Daily Responsibilities

Defining the different types of Level IIIs and some aspects of what their job entails

5 Things to Consider When Choosing a Mag Particle Yoke [Checklist]

4 Habits of NDT Aerosol Safe Handling

Safety is a make-or-break factor in a technician's world – we list details around hazards, storage, recycling, and shipping of NDT aerosols

Aerospace MRO NDT

Case Study - Reducing Particle Loss During Mag Particle Testing

In this case study, we help an aerospace MRO customer resolve fluctuations in their magnetic particle concentration

Case Study – Side-by-side evaluation of MAGNAGLO WB-12 and MAGNAGLO 14HF

Case Study – Side-by-side evaluation of MAGNAGLO WB-12 and MAGNAGLO 14HF

Case Study – Understanding the implications of the new EMF regulations for magnetic particle inspection

Understanding the implications of the new EMF regulations for magnetic particle inspection

Discontinuation Notice – YM5 Permanent Magnet Yoke

Effective immediately, the Magnaflux YM5 Permanent Magnet Yoke (part number 001Y005) is discontinued.

Product Launch: Universal WE Stationary Crack Detection Unit

Magnaflux EMEAR is delighted to announce the launch of the Universal WE Stationary Crack Detection Unit, which represents a significant upgrade to the Universal 600/900 WE

The Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work Regulations (2016)

The Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work Regulations (2016)

The Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work Regulations (2016), Electromagnetic Fields Directive, 2013/35/EU

Subscribe to Magnaflux NDT Blogs:

Magnaflux

Faraday Road, South Dorcan Industrial Estate
Swindon, Wiltshire, SN3 5HE, UK
Telephone: +44 (0)1793 524566
Contact Magnaflux Customer Service

Select Your Country North America Mexico Brazil China Europe Russia India New Zealand, Australia, Japan, Southeast Asia
© 2021 Magnaflux - all rights reserved.
top

We have placed cookies on your computer to give you the best possible experience with our website. These cookies are also used to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, you are agreeing to our use of cookies to improve your user experience. You can click the cookie settings link on our website to change your cookie settings at any time.